Strategy added by DragonsAfterDark
6
6
Average rating: |
4.6 |
Ratings: |
12 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
||||||||||
1 | Script |
2 | 4.9 | 63 | 104
1:44
|
13+ | ||||
2 |
I only tried this once with this team and it worked first time. Other breeds for Shadowback Crawler might also work.
Script thanks to FMJustice |
Script |
2 | 4.9 | 33 | 109
1:49
|
16+ | |||
3 |
Updated with the Tideskipper in slot #3
Video for Fight: Pre-Tideskipper |
Breed Script |
2 | 4.6 | 6 | 110
1:50
|
18+ | |||
4 |
This is a variation of Mutanis' strategy using a Young Mutant Warturtle and a slower Benax breed than in his strategy.
My Benax is a H/P breed, so its slower than his recommended 255 - still worked for me. Young Mutant Warturtle also doesnt have to be a rare one. The green one works aswell. (I used a H/P one) |
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 2 | 101
1:41
|
13-14 | |||
5 |
I haven't had Bloodbiter kill my Lightless ambusher, so the moves outlined below are my best guess for how it would go; the script reflects these moves.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 3 | 88
1:28
|
11-13 | |||
6 |
Many family battler strategies use rare, or raid-looted pets. This strategy aims to offer an accessible way of dealing with this fight, using only easy-to-get pets. Enjoy ! :)
|
Script |
2 | 3.2 | 3 | 131
2:11
|
20 | |||
7 |
A lot of potential for failure due to the 10% increased chance to miss during Darkness, but I won't put additional stuff into steps or script.
When it's only about killing Bloodripper, I think you can do that on your own, or just restart. Good luck! The pets suggested for the first two slots have a ton of available breeds, so I could only test what I've got. |
Breed RNG Script |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 95
1:35
|
12+ | |||
8 | RNG |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 110
1:50
|
13+ |
Incl. steps:
Updated with the Tideskipper in slot #3
Video for Fight: Pre-Tideskipper
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Terrible Tina? Sounds like a familiar Wonderland!
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsRuta
wrote on 2023-05-07 14:59:47
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsCrazyMath#2526
wrote on 2023-02-09 19:08:23
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGAFFiO
wrote on 2023-01-03 10:53:20
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGAFFiO
wrote on 2023-01-03 11:03:41
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsKangarooblue wrote on 2022-12-06 11:50:49
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentssecretlyrich
wrote on 2022-12-03 22:26:19
1
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) DragonsAfterDark
wrote on 2022-12-03 22:47:22
ETA: I added a note in the info section. ^^ (edited)
New Comment: